<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">

不同晶化溫度對硅錳渣鑄石的內部溫差、析晶和物理性能的影響規律

Effects of different crystallization temperatures on temperature difference, crystallization, and physical properties of silica–manganese slag cast stone

  • 摘要: 以硅錳渣為主要原料,采用熔渣冷卻析晶一步法(鑄石澆鑄法),在800、900、1000和1050 ℃四個不同晶化溫度,分別制備了規格為?100 mm×20 mm的鑄石樣品CT-800、CT-900、CT-1000 和CT-1050,通過構建實驗裝置,測試了熔渣在成型和熱處理全過程中心與邊緣溫度變化規律,并結合X射線衍射(XRD)、差示掃描量熱分析(DSC)、掃描電子顯微鏡和能譜(SEM–EDS)等手段,分析了不同晶化溫度對鑄石中心和邊緣的溫差、析晶與物理性能的影響規律. 研究表明:以硅錳渣為主要原料在900~1050 ℃保溫析晶可以制備出滿足天然花崗巖建筑板材標準(GB/T18601—2009)的鑄石,晶相為輝石、黃長石以及硫化錳. CT-1000 和CT-1050鑄石析出更多和更大尺寸的晶相,存在微觀孔隙和宏觀縮孔,降低了其力學性能. CT-900具有最佳性能,而CT-800以玻璃相為主,熱處理后發生斷裂. 在本實驗條件下,最大溫差(32 ℃)發生在把熔渣倒入模具的凝固成型階段,且晶化溫度越低,溫差越大. CT-1000 和CT-1050析晶階段存在的大量析晶放熱導致溫差二次增大,延長了中心和邊緣溫度一致的時間. 硫化錳是高溫熔融態下析出晶相,易于氧化分解,快速冷卻的邊緣存在更多硫化錳相. 黃長石較輝石在更高的溫度下析出,較高的晶化溫度處理樣品和相同晶化溫度下樣品的中心部分均存在相對更多的黃長石相.

     

    Abstract: Direct preparation of glass-ceramics from slag is an efficient way to use the “slag” and “heat” of the slag, making this preparation a sought-after research topic. To prepare glass-ceramics using the Petrurgic method, this paper used silico–manganese slag as the main raw material, along with chromite and serpentine as modifiers. The Petrurgic method is a heat treatment process involving controlled crystallization during slag cooling to form glass-ceramics. The prepared glass-ceramic samples had a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 20 mm. Various tests and analyses such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, flexural strength, compressive strength, water absorption, and bulk density were performed on the samples. The influence of different heat treatment regimens on the phase composition and properties of silico–manganese slag microcrystalline glass was discussed. Additionally, the study investigated the temperature variation inside the glass-ceramic samples, and the results indicated that by modifying the slag and annealing it at 700℃ after cooling to the crystallization temperature, microcrystalline glass meets the performance requirements of natural granite. The temperature range of 900–1050 ℃ was found to be associated with the crystallization of the augite phase, while the temperature range of 1000–1050 ℃ was related to the crystallization of the akermanite phase. With improvements in the heat treatment system, the amount of akermanite phase precipitation will increase, and the grain will become coarser than before. At 900 ℃, the grain growth of the microcrystalline glass was not as significant as that of the samples annealed at 1000 ℃ and 1050 ℃, and the lack of excessive crystallization led to fewer defects inside the glass-ceramics. After studying the temperature profile data, it was observed that during the heat treatment process at 1000–1050 ℃, inconsistent crystallization between the inner and outer parts of the sample resulted in a temperature gradient from the center to the edge. After studying the temperature profile data, it was observed that during the heat treatment process at 1000–1050 ℃, inconsistent crystallization between the inner and outer parts of the sample resulted in a temperature gradient from the center to the edge. However, at 900 ℃, the temperatures of the central and edge regions remained consistent during the crystallization stage. For the heat treatment at 800 ℃, the slag temperature quickly decreased below 900–1050 ℃, making crystallization difficult. The overall trend of the temperature difference between the central and side parts of the sample was similar for all four heat-treatment conditions. After casting the slag into the mold, temperature gradients were formed within the sample. These formations do not affect the types of crystalline phases that precipitate; however, they do affect the quantity of crystallization.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
259luxu-164