<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">

裝配式鋼結構辦公建筑全生命周期碳排放計算方法研究與應用

Research and application of carbon emission calculation methods for the whole life cycle of assembled steel structure office buildings

  • 摘要: 為了系統計算裝配式鋼結構辦公建筑的碳排放,本文構建了裝配式鋼結構全生命周期碳排放計算模型,借助Autodesk Revit、Tekla Structures和商業建筑熱環境設計模擬工具包(DeST-C)提供了明確計算方法,以無錫中電創新園為案例,進行了全生命周期碳排放計算,并與裝配式混凝土(PC)結構、現澆鋼混結構進行了碳排放比較分析. 本碳排放計算模型全面考慮了建筑全生命周期的材料制備及構件生產階段、物流轉運階段、施工建造階段、運行維護階段、改造再用階段和拆除再用階段六大階段,涵蓋了“人機料”全要素碳排放活動,并實現了鋼結構構件的碳排放因子計算,具有完整性和準確性. 案例分析結果顯示:裝配式鋼結構建筑年均碳排放強度為59.47 kg·m?2·a?1,比裝配式PC結構、現澆鋼混結構建筑分別減少5.46 kg·m?2·a?1、13.59 kg·m?2·a?1,展現了裝配式鋼結構建筑良好的減碳效果;在六大階段中,運行階段碳排放量最大,占比58.79%,其次是材料制備及構件生產階段,占比29.58%,建筑拆除再用階段碳排放量為?3295.27 t,具有良好的減碳效果;考慮可再生能源及植物碳匯因素后,減碳389.33 t. 本文提出的方法為裝配式鋼結構辦公建筑全生命周期碳排放計算問題提供了新的解決思路,為裝配式鋼結構辦公建筑減碳評估提供了依據.

     

    Abstract: To accurately assess the carbon emissions associated with assembled steel structure office buildings, this study develops a comprehensive life cycle carbon emission calculation. Utilizing advanced tools such as Autodesk Revit, Tekla Structures, and DeST-C, the model offers a detailed methodology for calculating emissions. This approach adheres to the guidelines set forth in the “Standard for the Calculation of Carbon Emission from Buildings” (GB/T 51366—2019). By applying this model to the Wuxi CEC PARK case study, the research quantifies the carbon footprint of such structures and compares these findings with those of assembled precast concrete structures and cast-in-place steel–concrete structures. The model encompasses all six stages of a building’s life cycle: material preparation and component production, logistics, operation and maintenance, renovation and reuse, and finally, dismantling and recycling. This comprehensive scope ensures that the model captures the carbon emissions linked to every aspect of “human, machine and material” interactions throughout the building’s life cycle. The accuracy of the calculation results is thus guaranteed. Specifically, the analysis highlights the carbon emission factors from steel structure components within the context of Wuxi CEC PARK. The results show that the average annual carbon emission intensity for the building is 59.47 kg·m?2·a?1. This figure is approximately 5.46 kg·m?2·a?1 and 13.59 kg·m?2·a?1 lower than that of the assembled PC structure and the cast-in-place steel–concrete structure, respectively. These results underscore the beneficial impact of assembled steel structures in reducing carbon emissions. The operation stage is the largest contributor to carbon emissions, accounting for 58.79% of the total. This is followed by carbon emissions from material preparation and component production, which represent 29.58%. The study finds a negative carbon emission value of ?3295.27 t in the dismantling and reuse phase, indicating a significant reduction in emissions in this phase of the building’s life cycle. Additionally, the incorporation of renewable energy sources and plant carbon sinks into the building’s design further offsets carbon emissions, contributing an additional reduction of 389.33 t. The method proposed in this paper addresses the gap in existing methodologies for full life cycle carbon emission calculations for assembled steel structure office buildings. It provides a solid foundation for such buildings, promoting the adoption of assembled steel structure office buildings. It lays a foundational framework for assessing the carbon reduction potential of these structures, thereby facilitating their wider adoption within the construction industry. It provides a reference for future research on the prediction of carbon emissions for similar office buildings and advancing carbon reduction initiatives in the construction industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
259luxu-164