<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">

基于圓環壓縮和擠壓–模擬法的Zr-4合金塑性成形摩擦因子測定

Measurement of friction factor in plastic forming of Zr-4 alloy based on ring compression and extrusion–simulation

  • 摘要: 采用圓環壓縮法和擠壓–模擬法測定Zr-4合金有潤滑條件下的摩擦因子,討論了2種方法所測定摩擦因子存在差異的原因。研究結果表明,在模具(砧面)粗糙度Ra = 0.6 μm、實驗溫度700~800 ℃的條件下,采用圓環壓縮法獲得的Zr-4合金與模具的摩擦因子為0.18~0.27,摩擦因子隨實驗溫度的升高而增大。擠壓溫度為750 ℃時,采用擠壓–模擬法獲得的熱擠壓平均摩擦因子為0.35。測試結果存在較大差異的原因,是由于擠壓過程潤滑劑的剪切速率較圓環壓縮實驗大得多,且擠壓過程中潤滑劑所受壓應力約為圓環壓縮實驗中的兩倍,從而導致潤滑劑黏度的增大,表現為摩擦因子較高。圓環壓縮法獲得的摩擦因子更適合于Zr-4合金的鍛造等熱加工工況。

     

    Abstract: Nuclear-grade zirconium alloys are characterized by large deformation resistance, poor fluidity, strong viscosity, and narrow forming temperature range. They are widely used in the nuclear industry and are a good choice for structural components and fuel cladding materials for nuclear power reactors. Reasonable process parameters and tooling design are very important for the production of zirconium alloy products with excellent performance. Simulation is an important technical means in plastic forming process and tool structure optimization. A prerequisite for accurate simulation is to determine precise boundary conditions, such as friction factors in plastic forming process. In this study, the friction factors under the lubrication condition of Zr-4 alloy were determined by ring compression and extrusion simulation method. The reasons for the difference in friction factors measured by the two methods were discussed. The results show that when the roughness of the die (anvil) is Ra = 0.6 μm and the experimental temperature is 700?800 ℃, the friction factor between the Zr-4 alloy and the die obtained by the ring compression is 0.18?0.27, and the friction factor increases with increasing in the experimental temperature. When the extrusion temperature is 750 ℃, the average friction factor of hot-extrusion obtained by extrusion simulation is 0.35. The reason for the large difference in the test results is that the shear rate of the lubricant in the extrusion process is much larger than that of the ring compression experiment, and the compressive stress of the lubricant in the extrusion process is about twice that in the ring compression experiment, which leads to an increase in the lubricant viscosity so that the friction factor is higher. The friction factor obtained by the ring compression method is more suitable for hot working conditions such as the forging of Zr-4 alloys.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
259luxu-164