<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">

TRB薄板變厚度軋制中前滑理論模型和數值模擬

Forward slip theoretical model and simulation for variable gauge rolling of TRB sheet

  • 摘要: 根據變厚度軋制特點和前滑定義,推導了一種變厚度軋制的前滑值的理論模型.用MARC軟件建立變厚度軋制的有限元模型,針對四種不同變厚度區形狀的軋件在軋制摩擦因數為0.08和0.1工況條件下的軋制過程進行了數值模擬.此外,采用軋制試驗方法實測了總前滑量.對比分析結果表明:前滑理論模型的計算值與有限元數值模擬結果接近,兩種方法計算所得前滑值的差值小于0.005.與常規恒厚度軋制中穩定前滑值不同,在變厚度區軋制時,前滑值在0.02~0.10波動.變厚度區的壓下率越大,其前滑值也越大;較小變厚度區斜度設計和低的摩擦因數會使變厚度軋制有更好的軋制穩定性和小的前滑波動范圍.TRB變厚度軋制試驗也驗證了前滑理論模型的精度.減薄軋制實測前滑值和計算值偏差大與變形區應變狀態及增加的打滑趨勢有關.

     

    Abstract: Based on the characteristic of variable gauge rolling and the definition of forward slip, a forward slip theoretical model was proposed in this article. A finite element model was also established with MARC software. The rolling processes of four different variable gauge strips were numerically simulated at the rolling friction coefficient of 0.08 and 0.1. In addition, the total amount of forward slip was measured by an experimental rolling approach. After comparison and analysis, it is found that there is little difference between the value calculated by theoretical forward slip model and the one simulated by finite element method. The difference is less than 0.005. Differing from stable forward slip in tradition constant thickness rolling, the forward slip fluctuates from 0.02 to 0.10 in the variable gauge rolling process. The increase of reduction rate in the variable gauge zone leads to a higher forward slip. A smaller slope of the variable gauge zone and the low friction coefficient result in a better rolling stability and a smaller fluctuation of forward slip. The experiment of TRB rolling also verifies the accuracy of the theoretical forward slip model for variable gauge rolling. The large tolerance between the measured value and the calculated one in thinning rolling is probably caused by the strain condition of deformation area and the increasing slip tendency.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
259luxu-164