<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">

海冰對單柱式橋墩非線性地震反應的影響

Effects of sea ice on the nonlinear seismic responses of single-column piers

  • 摘要: 用簡化的附加水質量模型考慮動水壓力對橋墩的影響,用動冰力模型考慮冰與橋墩的相互作用,建立了冰水域單柱式橋墩地震反應的動力計算模型,并利用時程分析法研究了在不同類型地震作用下海冰對橋墩非線性地震反應的影響.橋墩的最不利反應一般發生在海冰質量為5×106~5×107kg,可作為橋墩設計時的海冰質量;且墩底截面出現最大曲率時對應的海冰質量隨著水深的增大而變大.有冰時墩底截面曲率延性需求系數、墩頂最大位移和墩頂殘余位移比無冰時增大數倍,墩底截面彎矩–曲率滯回曲線呈倒"S"型更顯著,橋墩的變形和耗能能力顯著下降.同時,與近場地震波作用時相比,遠場地震波作用下海冰對單柱式橋墩頂部最大位移和殘余位移的影響更大.

     

    Abstract: The effect of hydrodynamic pressure on bridge piers was considered by a simplified model of additional water and the interaction between ice and bridge piers was taken into account by a dynamic ice force model, then a seismic response analysis model was established for a single-column pier surrounded by sea ice and the nonlinear seismic responses of the pier subject to different types of earthquakes were analyzed by using the time-history analysis method. It is shown that the least favorite seismic responses of the pier occur when the mass of sea ice is 5×106 to 5×107 kg, which can be used as the design mass of sea ice to design a bridge pier. The mass of sea ice under the maximum curvature condition of the pier increases with the water depth increasing. The curvature ductility demand coefficient, the maximum displacement and the residual displacement of the pier surrounded by sea ice are several times larger than the seismic responses of the pier which is not. Since sea ice also makes the moment-curvature hysteretic curves of the pier's bottom cross-section present a downfallen ‘S’ form significantly, the deformability and energy dissipation capability of the pier drop remarkably. Compared with the pier subjected to a near-field seismic wave, the effects of sea ice on the maximum displacement and residual displacement of the pier subjected to a far-field seismic wave are more remarkable.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
259luxu-164