<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">

燃氣輻射管換熱器的結構優化與數值模擬

Structural optimization and numerical simulation of gas-fired radiant tube heat exchangers

  • 摘要: 為解決W型燃氣輻射管換熱器排煙溫度高的問題,設計了三種改進換熱器性能的結構,采用ANSYS FLUENT軟件進行數值模擬,得到了不同結構換熱器的性能參數,如煙氣出口溫度、空氣預熱溫度、壓力損失、各換熱面換熱量和有無折流板的熱阻變化.結果表明,中心空氣管由一根φ79 mm粗管改為六根φ33 mm細管后換熱量增加了57.6%,增設煙氣雙行程后換熱量提高20.7%.增設密封折流板和多孔折流板后換熱量分別增加了5.7%和5.3%,空氣和煙氣之間的熱阻都降低了20%左右.多孔折流板的煙氣壓力損失比密封折流板低47.4%.

     

    Abstract: In order to solve the problem of high exhaust gas temperature in W-shaped gas-fired radiant tubes, three kinds of structures were designed to improve the heat exchanger performance. Numerical simulation was carried out by using ANSYS FLUENT software. The performance parameters of heat exchangers with different structures were obtained, such as exhaust gas outlet temperature, preheated air temperature, pressure loss, heat flux in each surface, and heat resistance change with and without baffles. It is shown that the quantity of heat exchange increases by 57.6% after the central air tube changes from one tube of φ79 mm to six tubes of φ33 mm and by 20.7% through adding a double trip of exhaust gas. After inserting the sealed baffle and porous baffle, the quantity of heat exchange increases by 5.7% and 5.3% respectively, and the thermal resistance between air and exhaust gas decreases both by about 20%. The pressure loss of the porous baffle is lower by 47.4% than the sealed-baffle.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<th id="5nh9l"></th> <strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><span id="5nh9l"></span><strike id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><strike id="5nh9l"></strike>
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
<span id="5nh9l"></span><span id="5nh9l"><video id="5nh9l"></video></span>
<th id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l"><th id="5nh9l"></th>
<progress id="5nh9l"><noframes id="5nh9l">
259luxu-164